IOM Philippines
A registry-backed algorithm for more consistent review of land claims.
Project overview
In the Philippines, land-tenure claims required a repeatable way to connect claimant records, program files, government registry data, and contextual evidence. The algorithm structures those inputs so adjudicators can compare cases, identify gaps, and review claims more consistently in complex property-rights environments.
Project story
Land and tenure claims in complex property-rights environments depend on many kinds of evidence: claimant information, program records, government registry data, and contextual material. For IOM Philippines, the challenge was to help review teams compare claims consistently while keeping gaps, conflicts, and registry matches visible.
The land-tenure algorithm organizes those inputs into a repeatable adjudication workflow. It supports review before decisions are made, not after. Adjudicators can see claimant information alongside registry evidence, identify missing records, compare similar cases, and work from a clearer evidence base when resolving claims and supporting tenure security.
Example deliverables
Concrete outputs or working assets the project produced or supported.
Decision problem
IOM Philippines needed a more consistent way to review land and tenure claims in complex property-rights environments. Claims teams had to connect claimant records, program data, government registry evidence, contextual information, and review criteria without losing track of gaps or inconsistencies across cases.
What the work involved
Built a registry-backed algorithm that connects program records with government registry data and structures claimant information for review.
Organized claimant records, registry matches, supporting evidence, and contextual information into a repeatable workflow for adjudication teams.
Made evidence gaps, record-matching issues, and claim-review criteria easier to see before decisions are made, giving adjudicators a clearer basis for resolving claims.
Outcome
Faster registry-backed claims review and stronger evidence for tenure security.
Evidence inputs
Review focus
Policy
A trilingual evidence platform helping officials bring source-linked research into real policy work.
Health
A predictive planning system for drought risk, facility readiness, and continuity of care.
Food security
Automated evidence synthesis for faster, more consistent early warning assessments.
Bring one decision, report, review process, or evidence problem. We will help identify the smallest useful place to begin.
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. For more information, please review our Privacy Policy.
